punkrockkparrill:

carlprocrastinates:

sadboyliberationfront:

hexfawn:

i made an aesthetic generator now you can discover urself

"pale queer" yea

lol “ass punk”

Sweet punk. You heard it here first!

eyebrow dad- nice

(Source: bogmilk)


rhamphotheca:

Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars

Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken

by Damian Carrington

Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.

The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular red meat requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more climate-warming emissions. When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases…

(read more: The Guardian UK)

photos: Shutterstock and Alamy


laina:

before storm / after storm

mechapuppy:

id like to carry around a fancy menu with me at all times that has like 30 different varieties of dick on it so i can hand it to people when i tell them to eat a dick. they deserve at least to have their choice of dick to eat